From the Pastor -Pentecost

June 3, 2022

Today we reach the finale of the Easter season with the celebration of the great Feast of Pentecost. Reflecting on today’s readings inspires a sense of awe as we consider the mighty power of the Holy Spirit at work giving birth to and sustaining our Church. Just as awesome — the same Spirit is calling to us this day to take up our part in the Church’s saving work.


In the first reading, from Acts, we see the creative genius of the Holy Spirit moving through the newly confirmed Apostles “who began to speak in different tongues as the Spirit enabled them to proclaim.” The large crowd, gathered from all over the world were “amazed” and “astounded” that each one could understand the Apostles speaking in their own language.


Each one of us, young and old alike, is personally called today by the Holy Spirit into the same mission as that of the first Apostles — to advance the Kingdom of God in our corner of the world. Just as He did on that Pentecost day, the Holy Spirit speaks to us in our “own language” to give us the Good News of the Gospel and urge us to share it. We can think of our own language as the particular gifts, talents, and passions we possess. We experience the presence of the Holy Spirit through them and we are meant put them to the work in grateful service of the Kingdom of God.


When we consider the stewardship way of life we are called to live, we often focus on the challenges it poses. Surrendering ourselves to God is indeed a challenging way to live. But it leads to a life that is exciting, creative, and deeply rewarding. Stewardship allows us to experience life as a great adventure because it is a life guided and directed by the very source of power and creativity — the Holy Spirit!

© Catholic Stewardship Consultants


Pastoral Pondering

I wanted to address a few things that have come my way over the past few days that I believe may be of interest to a wider audience.


Sign of Peace and Communion – While most of the restrictions that were enacted by the Diocese with COVID have been removed, there are still restrictions on the Sign of Peace and offering both species at Holy Communion. My observation at Mass has generally been that even though the deacon does not announce the sign of peace, many families and friends are sharing some sign of their own volition. This is fine. We should also remember that there are a number of ways that the sign of peace can be offered other than shaking hands, e.g., bowing, simply indicating peace vocally, etc.


The Communion cup, of course raises other concerns. Prior to COVID we had moved to sharing Communion in this way to special feast days such as Corpus Christi, which is actually what the liturgical documents indicate is proper. With COVID’s arrival, however, this was eliminated completely except for those with special accommodation due to food allergies. We have received no indication when or if this option might be available again. I think a modified sign of peace will return before the cup for Communion.


Speaker Pelosi and the Archbishop – Some folks have expressed confusion concerning the Archbishop of San Francisco’s statement that Representative Nancy Pelosi is no longer able to receive Communion until she repents of her public promotion of abortion based on the norm expressed in canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law.


The responses that I have seen out in the media world have been varied from accusing the Archbishop of being political to those who declare that his action was far overdue. The canon in question states the following:


can. 915† Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.


I have underlined the portion of the canon that is operative here. From Archbishop Cordileone’s statement, it is clear that he had made a number of attempts over the past number of years to engage the Speaker on this matter. Most recently, however, in light of her support of legislation that would go far beyond Roe vs. Wade, the Speaker did not respond to his requests.


The primary concern of the second clause of the canon is the causing of public scandal. Both excommunication and interdict are remedial penalties meant to bring the subject back to full Communion with the Church. The action involved here, while it certainly aims to correct error and restore right relationship, is more concerned with the scandal caused when a public person, who regularly presents herself as a devout Catholic, promotes positions that are in clear opposition to Catholic moral teaching.


It seems clear to me that this was not something that the Archbishop wanted to do, but he felt it was something he had to do, not only for the good of the Speaker’s eternal soul, but also to alleviate the scandal caused by her contrary witness. Moreover, the Archbishop’s statement deals solely with the life of the Church. It has no impact on the public sphere and, therefore, is certainly not political. The Archbishop, as do all pastors of souls, has a responsibility to confirm the faithful, ensure sound teaching, and promote proper devotion and respect for the sacraments of the Church.


Each bishop is responsible for this in his particular diocese; therefore, you can see various responses from different bishops. While, in my opinion, this is terribly confusing on many levels, it is the state of the matter here in the United States. All of us should pray for the Archbishop as he exercises his apostolic office, and we should also pray for all of those members of the flock who, because of the public nature of their witness, cause scandal and wonderment among the faithful and the community at large.


Gun violence and mass shootings – As I write this, the recent school shooting in Texas is still a very open wound for the country. These events are terrible tragedies, especially when there is significant loss of life. On one hand such events are not new and, thankfully, are few. Nonetheless, when they occur, they often lead to shock, wonderment and even uncertainty about the goodness of God.


First and foremost, we know that God is good and He never intends an intrinsic evil. Because of our fallen human nature and the freedom with which we are endowed, however, He allows, through His permissive will, such things to occur. And, regardless of how terrible something may be, can often bring about some good in the midst of the tragedy, e.g., a family reconciliation, a greater awareness of mental illness, etc.


Whether aided by the isolation that arose during COVID or some other factor, it does seem that anger, confusion and desperation can be found in plenty in society today. One of the reasons that we engaged a counselor on staff was due to the trends that we were seeing over the past couple of years.


Of course, our first response, should be fervent prayer for the victims and their families as well as prayer for those who perpetrate these things. These things also demand that we, as followers of Christ, look for ways to address what ails our society and try, as best we can, to be part of a helpful solution.


Security also becomes a concern, and be assured, that the security of the parish is very important, and steps are being taken to ensure that we have a proper security plan in place. No one should have to be afraid when they come to church or go to school. While we cannot eliminate all possible threats, we can learn to be more vigilant and be as prepared as we can be in the midst of this present world.


From the Pastor

From the Pastor - Sixth Sunday of Easter

By Lauren Rupar • May 15, 2026
On this sixth Sunday of Easter, our readings remind us that God must come first in our lives, and that love of God is shown through concrete actions — this is precisely why the stewardship way of life is so necessary. Our second reading, from St. Peter, challenges us to “Sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts.” In other words, we are to put Christ above all else. His role is not only as Savior — as essential as that is — but as Lord of our lives. As His disciples, we are called to place Him at the center of everything — our time, our talent, and our treasure. The beauty of the stewardship way of life is that it gives us a concrete way to live this out. It allows us to demonstrate that Christ truly is Lord of our lives, because love is not merely a feeling. “Whoever has my commandments and observes them is the one who loves me,” Jesus tells us in our Gospel from John. True love is an act of the will. It requires obedience, humility, and deep trust in God. But the reward is extraordinary. Christ tells us, “Whoever loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and reveal myself to him.” Could there be anything more fulfilling than living in such a way that the God of the universe reveals Himself more fully to us? © Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2026 Pastoral Pondering Lately, with various discussions in the news, particularly with regard to a recent perceived back and forth between the Holy Father and President Trump, the issue of Catholic teaching and the authority of that teaching has come up. Hence, I thought it might be helpful to outline the levels of magisterial teaching in an effort to help folks navigate the different types of teaching along with the required response to each level. Summary: Levels of Magisterial Teaching The Catholic Church teaches with Christ’s authority through the Magisterium , but not all teachings carry the same weight or demand the same level of assent. Understanding these distinctions helps Catholics know how to respond faithfully to Church teaching. 1. Solemn Definitions (Extraordinary Magisterium) These are infallible dogmas formally defined by an ecumenical council or by the pope speaking ex cathedra. They concern truths revealed by God (e.g., the Immaculate Conception, the Assumption). Required response : The assent of faith. Denial is heresy. 2. Ordinary Universal Magisterium Teachings consistently and universally held by the bishops in communion with the pope, even without a formal definition. When universal agreement is clear, these teachings are also infallible (e.g., the intrinsic evil of abortion, male-only priesthood). Required response : The assent of faith. Denial is heresy. 3. Definitive Teachings (Non‑Revealed but Certain) Teachings proposed definitively because they are necessary to safeguard or explain divine revelation, even if not themselves formally revealed (e.g., canonizations, invalidity of Anglican orders). Required response: Definitive assent. Denial is grave error, though not heresy. 4. Authoritative but Non‑Definitive Teaching Non‑infallible teachings of the pope or bishops, such as many encyclicals or pastoral directives. Required response : Religious submission of intellect and will — a sincere openness and respect, not casual dismissal. 5. Prudential Judgments and Pastoral Applications Concrete applications of moral principles to specific situations (e.g., policy approaches in economics or immigration). Required response: Respectful consideration. Legitimate disagreement is possible. Why this matters : Recognizing these levels avoids two extremes—treating all Church teaching as optional opinion (laxism) or treating every Church statement as infallible dogma (rigorism). The Church teaches as a structured, living authority guided by the Holy Spirit, calling for responses proportionate to the level of teaching involved.

From the Pastor - Fifth Sunday of Easter

By John Putnam • May 1, 2026
The readings on this fifth Sunday of Easter present us with themes of dwelling places and home. As Christian stewards, we recognize that this world is not our permanent home. We are pilgrims here, making our way through the stewardship way of life toward our true home — heaven. Yet, as we journey toward heaven, we are called to make our dwelling here — whether in a household of one or a full and busy family — a true “domestic church.” In other words, the stewardship way of life begins long before we set foot on parish grounds. Stewardship starts at home. It begins with our families — our domestic churches. The domestic church plays a key role in our sanctification because it is the primary place where we learn and practice selfless love of others. In our Gospel passage from John, Jesus speaks of heaven as a home filled with dwelling places. “In my Father’s house there are many dwelling places. If there were not, would I have told you that I am going to prepare a place for you?” This is a beautiful image of the glory that awaits us and the personal love our Lord has for us — preparing a place for each one of us who remains faithful to Him. Let us respond to this great love by becoming good stewards of our earthly dwellings, making our homes true “domestic churches” where we honor God through prayer, care for one another, and generous hospitality. Let us never forget that stewardship starts at home! © Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2026 Pastoral Pondering A common question that comes up is why non-Catholics can’t receive Communion at weddings or funerals . Hence, it continuing to address basics of the faith, I offer the following: The Holy Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian life, the real presence of our Lord Jesus Christ—Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity—under the appearances of bread and wine. Because the Eucharist both signifies and effects the unity of the Church, the Catholic Church approaches the question of Eucharistic sharing, often called “intercommunion,” with profound reverence and care. Catholic teaching holds that full participation in the Eucharist expresses full communion in faith, worship, and ecclesial life. For this reason, the Church ordinarily admits to Holy Communion only those who are fully initiated Catholics and who are properly disposed: in the state of grace, having observed the Eucharistic fast, and free from grave sin. Intercommunion with Other Christians Members of other Christian communities are not ordinarily admitted to Holy Communion at Catholic Masses. As the USCCB Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state: “Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion.” Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law. A clear distinction exists between different Christian traditions: Eastern Churches (such as the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church) possess a valid priesthood and Eucharist by apostolic succession. Catholic ministers may licitly administer the sacraments of Penance, Eucharist, and Anointing of the Sick to members of these Churches if they spontaneously request them and are properly disposed (Canon 844 §3). However, these Christians are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches, many of which do not permit reception in Catholic celebrations. Other Christians (including Protestants) do not share the Catholic understanding of the Real Presence or the priesthood in its fullness. For them, reception of Holy Communion in a Catholic celebration is permitted only in cases of grave necessity—such as danger of death—when they cannot approach a minister of their own community, they request the sacrament freely, and they manifest Catholic faith in the Eucharist while possessing the required dispositions (Canon 844 §4). General invitations at weddings, funerals, or other occasions are not permitted, as they could imply a unity that does not yet exist. Catholics, in turn, may receive the sacraments only from Catholic ministers, with very limited exceptions for the Eastern Churches when necessary (Canon 844 §2). Catholics are not permitted to receive Communion in most Protestant services, as those celebrations do not possess a validly ordained priesthood. A Call to Charity and Prayer These norms are not rooted in exclusion but in fidelity to the truth of the Eucharist as the sacrament of ecclesial unity. The Church recognizes the real, though imperfect, communion that exists with all the baptized through faith in Christ and the gift of Baptism. We are encouraged to foster unity through joint prayer, Scripture study, works of charity, and dialogue, while patiently awaiting the full visible unity for which Christ prayed. As the Catechism teaches, “Ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation… have not preserved the proper reality of the Eucharistic mystery in its fullness, which is why Eucharistic intercommunion is not possible” (CCC 1400). Yet we rejoice in the elements of sanctification and truth present in these communities and pray earnestly for the day when all Christians may gather at one altar in complete communion. If you have questions about these teachings—perhaps in the context of family members of other Christian traditions—please speak with a priest. He can offer pastoral guidance tailored to your situation while remaining faithful to Church discipline. May our reverence for the Most Blessed Sacrament deepen our love for Christ and our longing for the unity of His Church.