From the Parochial Vicar - 7th Sunday in Ordinary Time

February 21, 2025

In today’s Gospel, taken from the sixth chapter of Luke, Jesus offers a very challenging, seemingly impossible approach to daily life. “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. To the person who strikes you on one cheek, offer the other one as well, and from the person who takes your cloak do not withhold even your tunic.” It makes one want to say, “Seriously, Lord?” And He doesn’t stop there. Jesus adds, “Give to everyone who asks of you, and from the one who takes what is yours do not demand it back.” 


It seems so unfair! That is, unless we look at this way of life from a stewardship point of view. Then, not only does it seem doable (though challenging), but it also actually makes perfect sense. A steward understands clearly that all he has and all that he is — his very life — is a gift from God given to him from an unfathomable abundance of love. This changes everything! This means “my” cloak, “my” tunic, “my” money, and time — all of it ultimately belongs to God. He has entrusted these things to each of us in love to use for His purposes and His glory.


Does this mean we are to be passive “doormats” to anyone who wants to take advantage of us? Certainly not. Jesus explains this in the next verse of this passage when He says, “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” There is nothing wrong with loving oneself since God loves us and has made us in His own image and likeness. Jesus is simply asking that we also approach others, and the sharing of our gifts, with this same attitude. He is giving us a definition here of real love, a steward’s love! 

©Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2025


Pastoral Pondering

Work is good, man is born for work, but that does not mean that we should forget that rest is good as well. 


A lot of times we hear the third commandment of remembering and keeping holy the Sabbath, and we think the commandment is only fulfilled when we attend Mass on that day. The commandment, of course, extends to more than that. Can. 1247 reminds us that in addition to participating at Mass on Sundays and other holy days of obligation, the faithful are to abstain from works and affairs that hinder the worship due to God, the joy proper to the Lord’s day, or suitable relaxation of mind and body. 


This canon, of course, is an adaptation from the 1917 code which stated explicitly that one is to abstain from servile work, judicial work, and commercial operations (1917 CIC 1248). The specific wording is not present in the recent code but it still requires us to abstain from such works or acts. 


Regarding the mention of work, there are 4 common ways work can distinguished: 


The works we hear of frequently in the third commandment are Servile works which are works that require mainly bodily activity and seek to serve the welfare of the body. It gets its name from the fact that this was work that was usually done by servants. So these would include works like digging or ploughing, and mechanical works. Servile work’s character is such that it is not determined by the worker’s intention, the fatigue of the work, nor if there is payment involved. The character is determined by the nature of the work itself. 


There are also Liberal works/cultural works which are works of the mind. They proceed from the soul and look to cultivate the mind. Examples are reading, writing, singing, playing instruments, drawing and painting. Theologians hold that these works remain liberal even if one is paid for it or expends a lot of energy in performing the work. 


A third type is called ordinary (natural) work which is done for the daily sustenance of the body. Examples include eating, hunting, driving, cooking etc. 


A fourth type of work is judicial and commercial work which takes place in court or in the course of public trading. Examples here include sitting in court, defending criminals, buying and selling, etc. 


There are other forms of work whose natures are difficult to determine, and in such cases one is guided by the common opinion of men. For example painting, rowing, exercise seem like servile work but common opinion sees acts like these as recreation and regard them as lawful. I’m inclined to call exercise an ordinary work because it can be for the daily sustenance of the body. 


So which ones are not permitted on Sunday? 


The principle that exists for this subject is that any form of servile, judicial, and commercial work is forbidden on Sundays and holy days of obligation, but cultural and ordinary work is permitted. The reason as stated earlier is that servile, judicial, and commercial work prevent us from giving sufficient attention to the Lord, because of its effect on the body, and this is what the commandment and canon law warn against. Ordinary and liberal work do not have the same effect so they are allowed. Although to this I would add that we do not let them hinder the specifications of Can. 1247. 


Can we be permitted to do servile work on Sunday? 


Yes, several causes can allow for servile work to be done on Sundays and on holy days: 


Dispensations, if there is a just cause, may be granted by the Pope, a bishop in his diocese, or a pastor of his Church. 


The Custom existing in a place could be a reason why servile work is excused, so long as the custom is permitted and has not been censured by the bishop. 


Charity, done as a form of relief for one's neighbor who is in need, is sufficient to excuse servile work. Some examples are taking care of the sick and the poor. 


Necessity excuses one from the obligation if he cannot otherwise support himself. It excuses one when one would not have food for the day if he did not work, or when a person works so as not to lose the job or certain goods. Some might be compelled to work on Sundays, and can’t refuse doing so, such would be a sufficient excuse from the obligation. As is necessary, one is welcome to perform household chores that keep the family fed and the house in proper order. Sometimes the personal necessity might exist if there is a danger of sinning because of idleness. 


Smallness of the matter can also excuse from violating the obligation. Servile work, if done, should not last more than two hours. And if perhaps the work is light in character, then three hours is good. 


Piety towards God excuses the violation of the precept. This would mean that works which proximately/directly consider the worship of God are lawful. Best examples of these could be actions that take place within the liturgy, some altar serving roles, ushering duties, working in the church to clean or decorate it. 


Some final thoughts. Regarding servile works, perhaps they are not the same as they previously were, i.e., the works that servants would do. But many of us are servants in a way, and so what we do on a regular basis could be the servile work that we are called to avoid on Sundays and holy days. Recognize that we should joyfully seek to give God due to worship and relax our minds and bodies. 



Rest is good! And what I want for us is to make sure that we are faithful to all, and not just one of the stipulations of the third commandment. 

— Fr. Chinonso Nnebe-Agumadu



From the Pastor

From the Pastor - Fourth Sunday of Easter

By John Putnam • April 24, 2026
Today’s readings on this fourth Sunday of Easter offer us a glimpse into the heart of our loving Savior. He is the Good Shepherd and we can confidently place our trust in Him as we live the stewardship way of life. This endearing image of Jesus as our shepherd, and His personal love for each one of us, is described in our Gospel passage from John, through the words of Jesus Himself. Here we read Jesus’ description of Himself as the “Good Shepherd.” He says of Himself, “The sheep hear his voice, as the shepherd calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has driven out all his own, he walks ahead of them and the sheep follow him, because they recognize his voice.” This aspect of our Lord’s tender and personal love for each one of us is a compelling reason to embrace the stewardship way of life — in the offering of our time, talent, and treasure to Him, we can express our gratitude to Him for the incomprehensible love He has for us. Embracing this way of life certainly requires trust on our part. But Christ has proven Himself worthy of our trust. He “bore our sins in His body.” He calls Himself our shepherd and He offers Himself as the guardian of our souls. He has withheld nothing of Himself and His goodness from us. He would never ask anything of us that would bring us harm. He tells us “I came so that [you] might have life and have it more abundantly.” This Easter season, let us resolve to entrust ourselves and our lives gratefully to Him. © Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2026 Pastoral Pondering As we continue our treatment of the basics of the faith and following up on last week’s discussion of cohabitation, this week I wanted to focus on Natural Family Planning which some people misconstrue as Catholic contraception. Natural Family Planning: The Catholic Way to Responsible Parenthood Natural Family Planning (NFP) consists of moral, scientific methods that help married couples achieve or postpone pregnancy by observing a woman’s natural signs of fertility—such as cervical mucus and basal body temperature—without drugs, devices, or surgery. The Catholic Church fully supports NFP because it respects God’s design for marital love, which is both **unitive** (bonding) and **procreative** (open to life). Unlike artificial contraception, which deliberately blocks fertility, NFP works with the body’s natural cycles through periodic abstinence when needed. Church Teaching In Humanae Vitae (1968), Pope St. Paul VI taught that couples may use the infertile periods for serious reasons, while always remaining open to the gift of children. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (2370) affirms that methods based on self-observation and infertile periods are morally acceptable because they respect the dignity of the spouses and promote authentic freedom. NFP is not “Catholic contraception.” The difference is in the heart: contraception rejects fertility in the act itself; NFP involves responsible discernment and periodic continence when there are just reasons (health, financial, emotional, or other proportionate circumstances). Couples should prayerfully discern together, ideally with a priest or spiritual director, avoiding a selfish “contraceptive mentality.” NFP can also help couples conceive by identifying the fertile window. Benefits for Catholic Couples - Strengthens marriage through better communication, mutual respect, and shared sacrifice. - Respects the woman’s body and natural rhythms. - Highly effective when properly learned and used. - Supports monitoring of reproductive health. Popular Church-approved methods include the Sympto-Thermal Method , Creighton Model , and Marquette Method . Instruction from a certified teacher is strongly recommended. A Parish Invitation As the domestic Church, families thrive when they live God’s plan for love and life. If you are preparing for marriage, newlywed, or seeking to grow in this area, contact your diocesan Family Life Office or visit the USCCB Natural Family Planning page for resources and local classes.  May the Lord bless all married couples as they cooperate with God in the beautiful vocation of responsible parenthood!

From the Pastor - Third Sunday of Easter

By John Putnam • April 17, 2026
Today’s readings focus on a theme of “sojourning.” As Christian stewards, we know our lives are a sojourn toward the ultimate destination of heaven. Our Gospel passage today describes the sojourn of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus. The two are dejected and despondent after Jesus’ death. They knew Jesus personally. They had heard the Gospel message directly from His lips. They heard the testimony of the women who discovered our Lord’s empty tomb and saw a vision of angels announcing He was alive. They had been informed by other disciples who went to the tomb that all was exactly as the women reported. How much more obvious could the Good News be? And yet, at times, the reaction of the two disciples describes our own stewardship journey, doesn’t it? We have the fullness of the Catholic faith, the power of the sacraments, and the support of our parish family. Yet, we often lose our way. We fail to see all the gifts we have been given. We lack trust in the perfect goodness and almighty power of God. But notice what happens to the two men when their eyes are opened once again, and they recognize Jesus in the Eucharist — the “breaking of the bread.” They are transformed! Their hearts are set on fire with love for the Lord and for their faith. They recall that their hearts began “burning within” as the Lord was explaining the Scriptures to them. When we find we have lost our way, we can go to the same sources as the two disciples on the road to Emmaus — the Scriptures and the Eucharist. In this Easter season, resolve to feast deeply on these two sources of grace. They are the fuel that will propel us on our journey toward heaven. © Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2026 Pastoral Pondering Returning to a review of Catholic teaching basics, as we move into Spring, we often see an increase in the number of weddings requested. Sadly, it is not uncommon these days to find couples choosing to live together prior to their marriage. Hence, I thought it would be a good idea to lay out the Church’s teaching on this matter in a concise way. Living Together Before Marriage: A Catholic Perspective From the Catholic Church’s teaching, living together (cohabitation) before marriage is morally wrong, primarily because it typically involves fornication —sexual relations outside of marriage—which is gravely sinful (CCC 2353). Human sexuality is a sacred gift ordered by God to the unitive and procreative purposes of marriage alone. Sexual intimacy outside marriage cannot express the total, faithful, and permanent self-giving that spouses vow in the sacrament. Instead, it says with the body what is not yet true in commitment: “I give myself to you completely and forever.” This makes the act a contradiction, contrary to the dignity of persons and God’s plan for love (see CCC 2391; USCCB resources on marriage preparation). Cohabitation also: Creates a near occasion of sin , placing the couple in a situation that strongly tempts them toward grave immorality. Gives scandal , leading others—especially the young—to doubt or dismiss the Church’s teaching on chastity and the sacredness of marriage. Treats marriage as a “trial” rather than the definitive covenant it is meant to be. True love “demands a total and definitive gift of persons to one another” and cannot be an arrangement “until further notice.” Additionally, studies cited by Catholic sources show that couples who cohabit before marriage face higher risks of divorce, instability, and weaker commitment compared to those who do not. The Church calls engaged couples to practice chastity in continence during preparation for marriage—an “apprenticeship in fidelity” that builds mutual respect and prepares them to receive the grace of the sacrament (CCC 2350). Priests, deacons and pastoral ministers accompany cohabiting couples with mercy and truth, encouraging them to live separately or chastely while preparing for a valid sacramental marriage. In a culture that often views cohabitation as practical or normal, the Church invites couples to witness the beauty of God’s design: chastity before marriage, followed by a joyful, lifelong union blessed by the sacrament. For more, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church (esp. 2331–2400).